Agema Publications

A forum for the disscussion of the Play by Mail games from Agema Publications


Variant Rule Games: What Would You Like?

Share

jamesbond007
Duke
Duke

Number of posts : 399
Age : 47
Location : Norwich
Reputation : 14
Registration date : 2009-04-07

Re: Variant Rule Games: What Would You Like?

Post by jamesbond007 on Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:01 am

I think some maybe missing two key points regarding the two nation idea.

Firstly. Will players have the time to play two turns in one go. Two positions per turn.? A lot more time needed. From what I see, often players apologising for not sending letters due to time. A lot of players would not have time to do this.

Secondly. Will Richard have to time to complete a turn with many more positions involved without delaying the turns considerably. Looking at turnaround time now, I fail to see how Richard could keep to current timescales. Which some bemoan are too long now.

avatar
Rozwi_Game10
Duke
Duke

Number of posts : 390
Location : North Yorkshire
Reputation : 6
Registration date : 2015-08-15

Re: Variant Rule Games: What Would You Like?

Post by Rozwi_Game10 on Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:28 am

Yep, two good points there.

In my case, for sake of discussion, I would have the time to play two positions as Rozwi isn't a huge time drain and diplomacy is basic. However, I'd only want to take on a smaller position in addition in the same Game. As, A) I wouldn't want to sicken myself with the repetitiveness of running two nations and doing the same tasks, one and after the other, seesawing both nations. And, B) I couldn't afford to pay for another nation requiring additional orders payments, as I don't have the disposable income to do so - mainly as such money gets spent on toy soldiers for wargaming, at present.

However, in all honesty, I doubt I'd pick up another nation, in any game, as I don't want to spoil the good thing I've got going with Rozwi. Playing two games of TGOK might just be the straw that broke the camel's back for me and make me get sick of playing for whatever reason. Looking at it sensibly, I think the better option for myself would be to play a Swashbuckler character in Game 10, but a character with some clout and importance in the game - maybe even a female lady / minor noble who can mix it up at court in an established position that likes to roleplay, or as a character introduced into a TGOK position where the main player isn't so much a roleplayer and would be willing to work as a team and allow such a Swashbuckler character to add something else to the nation being played and help Honour to be raised through diplomacy and roleplaying in the newspaper?

Adding a Swashbuckler character, such as the above, might be easier to shoehorn into a game then adding a 'second-played' nation, for both the players and the GM.

J Flower
King
King

Number of posts : 714
Age : 46
Location : Paderborn, Germany
Reputation : 13
Registration date : 2012-02-16

Re: Variant Rule Games: What Would You Like?

Post by J Flower on Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:46 pm

Maybe an idea would be to have the larger powers bulked out a bit so you have all of China, all Of the Holy Roman Empire, The full Ottoman Empire. British Empire. French Empire Russian Empire,Spanish Empire.A Baltic Position combining Sweden& Denmark. & Basically have less players but with Much larger positions.With some of the remaining smaller powers acting as vassal states So you would have about 10-12 Major positions, which is probably about the same number of active players we on average have in a game.
avatar
Deacon
Emperor
Emperor

Number of posts : 1414
Age : 54
Location : Portland OR, USA
Reputation : 38
Registration date : 2010-04-13

Re: Variant Rule Games: What Would You Like?

Post by Deacon on Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:52 pm


That's an interesting idea!

jamesbond007
Duke
Duke

Number of posts : 399
Age : 47
Location : Norwich
Reputation : 14
Registration date : 2009-04-07

Re: Variant Rule Games: What Would You Like?

Post by jamesbond007 on Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:27 am

Yes. I like the idea also.

The only snag could come for some people would be cost. The bigger the position the greater cost per turn. Or could Richard keep costs the same as less work on non playing positions.?

If such a game came up for lgdr, I would be in.

Nexus06
Earl
Earl

Number of posts : 227
Age : 44
Location : Bologna, Italy
Reputation : 1
Registration date : 2015-04-14

Re: Variant Rule Games: What Would You Like?

Post by Nexus06 on Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:51 am

J Flower wrote:Maybe an idea would be to have the larger powers bulked out a bit so you have all of China, all Of the Holy Roman Empire, The full Ottoman Empire. British Empire. French Empire Russian Empire,Spanish Empire.A Baltic Position combining Sweden& Denmark. & Basically have less players but with Much larger positions.With some of the remaining smaller powers acting as vassal states So you would have about 10-12 Major positions, which is probably about the same number of active players we on average have in a game.

For sure some of the positions actually splitted aren't so attractive as the full one. but i think is more a balancing issue.

Let us say you play all Ottoman empire in just one go. It would be very hard, i think, for richard to recreate the fleebile basic power of the sultan, the massive intrigue & so on. So sooner or later you would have a reinassanced ottoman empire conquering the world. Having it splitted in parts, thus less attractive if you can't manage to gather a bounch of friends to play (wich is anyway a good marketing option) helps keeping it in balance i think, as you can't be as coordinated as one, and different honour goals can simulate the different objectives any position has.


Might i propose a slightly different element?

In the moment i'm writing we have no info on the "level of occupation" of the active games. We also have a slightly different perception of the available positions, as for example we all thought Milan was playable, when in truth it is not.
Would be nice to have a list of available position per game, and may be a list of players wishing to join if some conditions exist (i.e. I would not play Ottoman alone, but i might consider joining a team of players).
silly?
avatar
Deacon
Emperor
Emperor

Number of posts : 1414
Age : 54
Location : Portland OR, USA
Reputation : 38
Registration date : 2010-04-13

Re: Variant Rule Games: What Would You Like?

Post by Deacon on Wed Sep 13, 2017 3:46 pm

How about a team game? You join with other folks on a team of nations?

So for instance, "The war of Spanish Succession". You're on the side of one or the other and it's on!

Your nation could choose to switch sides, maybe with honour impacts, and you're free to act, but you start as part of a pre-defined team.

Could do something similar with some of the smaller positions in Germany, maybe.

Nexus06
Earl
Earl

Number of posts : 227
Age : 44
Location : Bologna, Italy
Reputation : 1
Registration date : 2015-04-14

Re: Variant Rule Games: What Would You Like?

Post by Nexus06 on Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:49 pm

Deacon wrote:How about a team game? You join with other folks on a team of nations?

So for instance, "The war of Spanish Succession". You're on the side of one or the other and it's on!

Your nation could choose to switch sides, maybe with honour impacts, and you're free to act, but you start as part of a pre-defined team.

Could do something similar with some of the smaller positions in Germany, maybe.

I think you could achieve this results by moving slightly foward the starting date of the game. War of spanish succession and great northern war are triggered, and you have to play.
But probably it would also change somehow the flavour of the game.

Sponsored content

Re: Variant Rule Games: What Would You Like?

Post by Sponsored content


    Current date/time is Fri Sep 22, 2017 9:16 am