A different question...
To develop a nation in terms of infrastructure and income via trade, you need...well...money. Some nations, such as England and France, tend to be wealthy naturally (under normal circumstances, exceptions being I suspect both in G7 where they are war devastated) and can afford to invest fairly easily but for majority of nations I suspect this isn't the case.
Now such nations can raise income by hiring out recruits, selling commissions, etc but these generate relatively small amounts and the cost of developments such as canals is comparatively high. For poorer nations, like Scotland, even building a single level of roads can be 20% of annual income and a level of canals can be twice (or more) of total national income. For such nations either the options are to use what 'spare' income you have to invest in trade and other developments (and maybe raise taxes) and hope in a few years that generates enough additional income to allow you to undertake such improvements; or you get a loan from a bank somewhere. If you want to do things quickly, the loan is the 'best' option.
Of course, if you are borrowing enough to build canals, you're going to be borrowing more than your income and you might need to borrow extra to cover loan repayments, for a couple of years at least, until things like a level of canals is complete and (hopefully) your income has increased enough to meet the interest (and enough spare to develop your nation). However, the amount of interest can easily be excessive-using an example from one game I am in, interest was working out at nearly 20% of national income (at least before any benefits from developments kick in)
Ok, I am sure everyone knows this but thought it best to spell it out so it was clear where I was coming from. Is this the best solution? Building up a national debt to a level that may not be supportable if investments do not pay off quickly enough? Is it better to play a long game, try to increase income by trade investments, tax increases, etc, until income levels make it possible to fund such developments? Or is there an alternative? I know in theory it might be possible to get another nation to fund you through subsidies but not sure that is a viable option.
To develop a nation in terms of infrastructure and income via trade, you need...well...money. Some nations, such as England and France, tend to be wealthy naturally (under normal circumstances, exceptions being I suspect both in G7 where they are war devastated) and can afford to invest fairly easily but for majority of nations I suspect this isn't the case.
Now such nations can raise income by hiring out recruits, selling commissions, etc but these generate relatively small amounts and the cost of developments such as canals is comparatively high. For poorer nations, like Scotland, even building a single level of roads can be 20% of annual income and a level of canals can be twice (or more) of total national income. For such nations either the options are to use what 'spare' income you have to invest in trade and other developments (and maybe raise taxes) and hope in a few years that generates enough additional income to allow you to undertake such improvements; or you get a loan from a bank somewhere. If you want to do things quickly, the loan is the 'best' option.
Of course, if you are borrowing enough to build canals, you're going to be borrowing more than your income and you might need to borrow extra to cover loan repayments, for a couple of years at least, until things like a level of canals is complete and (hopefully) your income has increased enough to meet the interest (and enough spare to develop your nation). However, the amount of interest can easily be excessive-using an example from one game I am in, interest was working out at nearly 20% of national income (at least before any benefits from developments kick in)
Ok, I am sure everyone knows this but thought it best to spell it out so it was clear where I was coming from. Is this the best solution? Building up a national debt to a level that may not be supportable if investments do not pay off quickly enough? Is it better to play a long game, try to increase income by trade investments, tax increases, etc, until income levels make it possible to fund such developments? Or is there an alternative? I know in theory it might be possible to get another nation to fund you through subsidies but not sure that is a viable option.