I have noticed that in G7 that Russians & Swedes fighting in the Baltic and Eastern Europe seemed to be really fit & strong......marching through snow storms to then storm fortresses via ladders with seemingly little effect and any sickness levels was soon sorted out by a month or so camping.
But send same Russians to the British Isles and half of them drop dead from the dreaded “Scots Flu” or related causes. Perhaps, its because historically the Russians were really bad at logistics and poor sailors but it seems that Russian forces in their home area are rock hard. You can March them through a howling snow storm in the Ukraine and you may get Sickness level 1. But show them some damp, or a few midges or even worse a boat and half of them are in hospital. And their recovery times also seem to be much worse than back home on the Steppe
I was wondering if anyone else had experience of fighting outside of their armies normal zone of opperations and if this problem applies to all troops equally or some positions are better than others? Do France, Spain, Dutch, English who have colonies & experience of other area's suffer less outside their home areas than say Moghul Indians or Asante troops?
And do some troops cope better in home areas that others? So Asante think its a really nice day while outsiders die of heat stroke in same conditions?
I was also wondering if like in Scabble it would benefit to get troops used to conditions? I swear in scabble the Brits and the Russians have spent have the game skiing or climbing mountains while the German Army now objects if it has to fight anywere which is not warm and with a very large beach.
V