Michael0 wrote:Yes, thanks, I understand it is a constitutional monarchy and that the Parliaments are different .
The Royal Prerogative in England at least gives the Government the right to declare war without the consent of Parliament. The Government "advises" the King that he should declare war and the king does as he is advised.
The First Lord of the Treasury can choose to allow Parliament to discuss whether to declare war but it is not constitutionally necessary since he can simply advise the King to do so.
Brave is the one who tries it though.
Of course , he then might have the wrath of Parliament ever after since the King is never wrong in the decisions he makes ( but only ever badly advised )
Things may have changed by the WSS period but in the 2nd Anglo-Dutch war of the 1660's and in all prior wars it was the Royal Perrogative of English Kings to declare war.
However unless the Monarch wanted to fight a war using only his feudal rights and dues, revenue from the Royal Estates, borrowing and money from taxation like customs duties which were granted for the life time of the Monarch. The King or Queen and their ministers would then have to go to Parliament to get them to raise the tax/revenue required to properly fund a war.
By the C17 with the increased cost of warfare it was quite clear that traditional forms of Royal finance were barely enough to fund the Government and Royal Court in peacetime let alone the vastly greater spending required in War time. The last attempt to fight a war without Parliamentary taxation being Charles I Bishops War in which the Royal Army basically ran out of money in a matter of weeks and the Crowns borrowing costs went through the roof.
In 1665 the English Government of Charles II congradulated itself on getting £2.5m out of Parliament to cover the charge of the war (2nd Anglo-Dutch War) for the first three years. In the event all of this money and more had been spent by the end of the 2nd year leading too key English ships being laid up in the Medway due to lack of money to pay their crews and then being destroyed in a Dutch raid on the unmanned ships.
Charles II was basically forced to make peace due to running out of money. But was able to get reasonable terms from the Dutch due to their financial position also being dire and they were more worried about Louis XIV than Charles II.
Interestingly for the third Anglo-Dutch war Charles II avoided a great degree of Parliamentary financial controls over his foreign policy and war making by taking large sums of cash of Louis XIV (secret treaty of Dover). So in theory a English King could declare war and avoid the effective Parliamentary veto by not calling Parliament and having 0% tax's apart from on foreigners. And funding the war from reserves and foreign grants/subsidies.
Though it should be noted that when details of the Treaty of Dover and French funding got out it was very unpopular in England and King Charles and his Ministers decided to withdraw from the war and the French alliance against the Dutch.